Question No : 1
Which statement best describes the sprint review?

• A.It is a chance for inspecting the outcome of a sprint and determining the next steps
• B.It is a mechanism to control the work of the developers
• C.It is a demo of the work that was done

Show Answers

Answer:
Explanation:
The scrum guide says: "The purpose of the Sprint Review is to inspect the outcome of the Sprint and determine future adaptations. "

Question No : 2
Several scrum teams share the scrum master. Developers of multiple teams approach the scrum master, because they need fulltime commitment from the same technical specialist for the next sprint.
What should the scrum master consider for the response to this problem? Choose the two best answers.

• A.The need for a stable velocity
• B.The benefit of the teams figuring it out theirselves
• C.The need to have all developers busy with work
• D.The ability of the scrum teams to produce integrated increments

Show Answers

Answer:
Explanation:
The working increment is the goal of the sprint and should be kept in mind. The self-managing aspect of the teams is also crucial to take in mind. Stable velocity and optimally used developers are not the scrum master's concern.

Question No : 3
When is it most appropriate for developers to change the Definition of Done

• A.During the sprint planning when they can’t fit enough into the sprint
• B.Prior to starting a new sprint
• C.In the retrospective when it turns out they can improve quality
• D.Prior to starting a new project

Show Answers

Answer:
Explanation:
The definition of done can be changed when more is learnt. This always needs to be done aiming at a high quality usable increment. The best time to reflect on this is the retrospective.

Question No : 4
Which two criteria are useful in deciding if something should be documented every sprint?

• A.It has always been documented in the past
• B.The documentation is used to enhance and maintain the software
• C.The scrum master demands it
• D.The software tool being used requires it
• E.It is required by the definition of done

Show Answers

Answer:
Explanation:
if the documentation is adding to the quality and maintenance of the software this is definitely a good argument for documenting every sprint. Just because that's the way it's done and we don't want change is not a good reason. Tooling that requires is also isn't. And the scrum master cannot demand this kind of things. If the company's definition of done says so, you must :)

Question No : 5
Why are automated builds important?

• A.You are unable to check in code without them
• B.They help you find defects and configuration management issues
• C.Without them you can’t tell if your code works
• D.They are part of the Definition of Done

Show Answers

Answer:
Explanation:
Automated builds will be made every time the code base gets changed. If a change to the code base breaks the build, the developers get informed immediately and can fix the build again without drifting off to far.

Question No : 6
What is the size of the scrum team?

• A.typically 10 or fewer people
• B.this differs every sprint
• C.at least 8 people
• D.3 to 11

Show Answers

Answer:
Explanation:
The scrum guide says: "The Scrum Team is small enough to remain nimble and large enough to complete significant work within a Sprint, typically 10 or fewer people. "

Question No : 7
What topics can be addressed during the sprint review? Choose the best answer.

• A.The scrum process
• B.All of these
• C.The increment
• D.Coding and engineering practices

Show Answers

Answer:
Explanation:
These are all potentional topics for the sprint review. If you are not sure, please read the sprint review section in the scrum guide again.

Question No : 8
What do scrum artifacts represent?

• A.Work that needs to be done
• B.Flow and feedback
• C.Work or value
• D.Visual representation of the progress

Show Answers

Answer:
Explanation:
The scrum artifacts are: product backlog, sprint backlog and the increment. They represent work or value.

Question No : 9
At the 10th sprint review, the stakeholders are disappointed and angry. They have determined that the product or system being built both will not meet their needs and will cost more than they are willing to spend.
What factors may have led to this? (choose three)

• A.Changes to the project plan were not adequately documented and shared
• B.The product owner has not been keeping the stakeholders aware of the progress of the project
• C.The project management office has not been engaged adequately
• D.The scrum master has not ensured that the project is transparent
• E.The stakeholders were not allowed to enter the development area
• F.The stakeholders haven’t been using sprint reviews to inspect and evaluate progress

Show Answers

Answer:
Explanation:
there is no project plan, the presence of stakeholders in the development area is probably not helping and there is no project management. Transparancy would avoid the surprise for the stakeholders. If the PO didn't frequently update them, this can also lead to surprise and disappointent. If the stakeholders couldn't attend the sprint review they would also not be up to date and missing out on an opportunity to inspect and adapt.

Question No : 10
What is an inappropriate activity for a developer with special QA skills?

• A.Create a plan for testing the application
• B.Identify tools and techniques to be used in testing the product
• C.Define acceptance criteria for features
• D.Delay test activities until a feature has been coded

Show Answers

Answer:
Explanation:
Test activities can start directly with the sprint.